In addition, not all the commits were coming under the 'optimal' criteria, described in the previous section. To my surprise, there were only 8 links! This definitely was not enough. A small utility was written which has scanned the CVE base, found all the links on GitHub (more 5000), and selected those which constituted the references to the commits that affected the C# (.cs) files.C# projects on GitHub have been sorted by the ratings, after that I run through the CVE database about 100 projects, most of them were not even mentioned. Search of the most popular C# projects from GitHub in CVE database.
![not even wrong examples not even wrong examples](https://st.hzcdn.com/fimgs/10020dd50f89f0c4_5635-w500-h375-b0-p0--.jpg)
![not even wrong examples not even wrong examples](https://sbt.blob.core.windows.net/storyboards/shielaabellon/sample.png)
Here are the basic approaches that I have used: The major information resources at which I was aiming, were the CVE base and the CVE Details site (as well as Google, GitHub, reddit, StackOverflow). I had made several tries from different sides towards finding vulnerabilities in open source C# projects, but they all have not produced the expected outcome. If CVE meets these requirements, most likely it will be available for detection using static analysis of the source code. The vulnerability is not the result of a specific error in the logic of the application work.
![not even wrong examples not even wrong examples](https://i.gr-assets.com/images/S/compressed.photo.goodreads.com/hostedimages/1380324644i/690880.jpg)
#NOT EVEN WRONG EXAMPLES CODE#
![not even wrong examples not even wrong examples](https://images.theconversation.com/files/438734/original/file-20211221-50538-11x1tn8.jpg)
But how does one measure quantities of labour? By the time the labour lasts, in measuring the labour by the hour, the day, etc. In this respect they can differ only by representing greater or smaller quantities of labour, as, for example, a greater amount of labour may be worked up in a silken handkerchief than in a brick. If we consider commodities as values, we consider them exclusively under the single aspect of realized, fixed, or, if you like, crystallized social labour.